WebWinters v. United States 这种形式一般是一个Supreme Court case， Supreme Court是美国最高法院，大概就是会针对大大小小的case做出一些裁决，这里就是一个叫Winters人对美国（也可以是人对人，州对人，人对学校等等）。 这句话的主干就是：Supreme Court决定用水的权利是保留给印第安人的。 Web24 feb. 2015 · 本文给出一篇GMAT阅读文章，介绍GMAT阅读题的解题步骤，供广大GMAT考生参考学习。. 例文： In Winters v. United States (1908), the Supreme Court held that the right to use waters flowing through or adjacent tothe Fort Belknap Indian Reservation was reserved to American Indians by the treaty establishing the reservation.

Tribal Waters and The Supreme Court - 3 Quarks Daily

WebIn Winter v. United States (1908), the Supreme Court held that the right to use flowing through or adjacent to the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation was reserved to American Indians by the treaty establishing the reservation. Web12 uur geleden · Lawyers for the Nation argue that according to Winters v. United States (1908), Indian reservations have rights to enough water to create a viable, permanent … elizabeth rawlins wsb tv nose

Winters v. United States [ v? ] WordReference Forums

Webof a reservation [5]. The Nation argues under Winters that the government has a duty to provide them with sucient water. The government argues the Nation has not identied a specic commitment of the government to provide the Nation with water. In United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation, the Supreme Court ruled that a trust relationship between ... Web11 aug. 2010 · In Winters v. United States (1908), the Supreme Court held that the right to use waters flowing through or adjacent to the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation was reserved to American Indians by the treaty establishing the reservation. Although this treaty did not mention water rights, ... Web2 jul. 2024 · In Winters v. United States (1908), the Supreme Court held that the right to use waters flowing through or adjacent to the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation was reserved to American Indians by the treaty establishing the reservation. force of will imdb